| Recent
Articles |
Monetizing RSS Feeds
Publishers are evaluating options and determining how they can profit from RSS
feeds. The two obvious contenders that publishers...
Microsoft, EU Feud Heating Up
The long-running antitrust saga involving Microsoft and the European Union took
another nasty turn as both sides engaged in fingerpointing...
Google
Coos To Analysts, Market Hearts Flutter
Executives from the Googleplex whispered sweetly into the ears of industry analysts
and convinced them growth opportunities do indeed exist for the search advertising
company...
MSN
Travel Embarks Again
The newly relaunched travel portal from MSN will be available as a beta version
as the portal tests out a similar look-and-feel to Windows...
|
|
03.03.06
Toys
'R' Us Quits Playing With Amazon
 By
David A. Utter
he partnership between Amazon.com and Toys 'R' Us came to an end as a judge ruled
in favor of the toy retailer and its desire to end the arrangement.
What does exclusivity mean? To Amazon and Toys 'R' Us, the term had different
meanings. The dictionary defines it as single, sole, not accompanied by others,
and that is how Toys 'R' Us viewed it. Amazon did not, and allowed other toy retailers
to sell their wares on Amazon.com alongside Toys 'R' Us.
To paraphrase a common net saying, legality ensued. Toys sued Amazon in May 2004
for making other toy sellers part of the site. The Seattle P-I reported
that New Jersey Chancery Court Judge Margaret Mary McVeigh agreed with Toys' complaint:
Amazon failed, the judge ruled, to honor its part of the bargain
when it gave the exclusive rights to sell toys on its site to Toys "R" Us -- and
then hedged its bets by allowing other retailers to sell toys right alongside
the Wayne, N.J.-based company's offerings.
This decision begins a 90-day period where the two companies will separate Toys'
business from Amazon, which does intend to continue offering toys on its site.
That includes returning ownership of the toysrus.com domain to Toys.
Amazon sued Toys in answering the original lawsuit. When various hot toy and baby
items became unavailable for holiday shoppers from Toys in 2003, Amazon was furious
at Toys' inability to keep those items in stock for Christmas delivery. Amazon
listed other third-party toy sellers to complement what Toys offered in an attempt
to avoid future holiday problems.
Now, Amazon will have to find another partner that can compete with not only Toys,
the number 2 toy retailer, but Wal-Mart, the number 1 toy retailer.
About
the Author:
David is a staff writer for WebProNews covering technology and business. |
|
